The belief that a deity exists in multidimensional space and time and claims to be a direct observer of the millions of crimes and yet refuses to come forward, while protecting, directing and setting examples that it uses to obstruct justice and to deny the truth.

No belief in any deity—multidimensional, omniscient, or otherwise—can legally or morally license the obstruction of justice, the silencing of crime victims, or the denial of their human rights. Your description frames a very specific theological claim (a deity that watches every crime in “multidimensional space and time” yet chooses non-intervention, protection of perpetrators, and active obstruction of truth). That belief itself is 100 % protected as a personal conviction. But any real-world conduct that flows from it and harms victims is not.

1. The belief is protected; the harmful conduct is not

• Holding the belief (forum internum) remains absolute under every major human-rights instrument: you can believe the deity is an eyewitness who refuses to testify, that it “protects and directs” abusers, or that divine silence is part of a larger plan. Australian law (Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) s 20, Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Act exemptions, etc.), the ICCPR Art 18, and equivalent statutes treat this exactly the same as any other religious or philosophical view.
• Acting on it (manifesting it by teaching, practice, or policy) hits the same hard limit as before: it can be restricted when it interferes with “the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.” If a priest, imam, elder, or believer cites this deity’s non-intervention to:
  • discourage a victim from reporting rape or child abuse (“God is watching but chooses silence; so should you”),
  • refuse to hand over evidence in a criminal investigation (“divine direction overrides secular court”),
  • pressure a victim into forgiveness or secrecy (“it’s the deity’s example”),
  • or lobby for legal exemptions that shield institutions from mandatory reporting, then those are prosecutable acts of obstruction, conspiracy, or child endangerment. Courts have said so repeatedly.

2. How this exact belief pattern has been used historically to deny victims’ rights

The mechanism you describe is not new; it is the classic “divine hiddenness + divine sovereignty” argument repurposed as institutional cover:

• Theological cover for non-reporting: For centuries, many faiths taught that an all-seeing God is the ultimate witness and judge, yet simultaneously instructed believers not to “bring scandal” or to leave justice to the deity. This produced the same outcome you name: millions of victims (child sexual abuse in churches, forced marriages, honour-based violence, institutional abuse) were told their suffering was observed but not to be publicly remedied by humans. The belief that the deity “refuses to come forward” was turned into a reason for humans to refuse as well.
• “God’s plan” or “divine example” defence: When perpetrators or institutions claim the deity itself “protects and directs” them, or sets an example of silence, this is simply a religious version of the “just following orders” defence. Modern inquiries (Australia’s Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, UK Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, US grand-jury reports) documented thousands of cases where exactly this reasoning delayed justice for decades.
• Multidimensional / omniscient framing does not change the law: Whether the deity is described in ancient scripture or in modern terms (“multidimensional space and time”), the legal test is identical. No jurisdiction grants a special exemption because the believer uses fancier cosmology. The moment the belief is used to obstruct a police investigation, destroy evidence, intimidate witnesses, or deny victims civil remedies, it becomes actionable.

3. Why the belief can feel like a permanent shield—and why it is not

• Political and cultural deference: In practice, authorities sometimes hesitate to challenge religious institutions because of the “protected belief” label. That hesitation is a policy failure, not a legal requirement. Australia’s mandatory reporting laws, removal of religious exemptions for child abuse reporting, and the National Redress Scheme were direct corrections to exactly this problem.
• Victim-blaming dressed as theology: Telling victims “the deity saw it and chose silence” can be psychologically devastating and can discourage reporting. But that is emotional coercion, not a protected manifestation of belief. It is treated by courts as grooming, intimidation, or psychological abuse when directed at children or vulnerable people.
• No “centuries-long” immunity: Every major reform—abolition of slavery, criminalisation of FGM, mandatory clergy reporting, statutes of limitation extensions for historic abuse—has overridden the “deity’s will” or “divine non-intervention” argument once the harm to victims became politically undeniable.

Bottom line (humanist perspective)

A belief that an all-observing deity refuses to come forward as a witness does not create a moral or legal safe harbour for anyone who uses that belief to obstruct justice or deny victims their day in court. The victims’ right to truth, safety, and redress is not subordinate to any cosmological claim. If religious institutions or individuals have spent centuries treating divine silence as a reason for human silence, that is a choice they made—not a requirement of human-rights law. Secular justice systems exist precisely to step into the gap the deity allegedly leaves.

If you are pointing to a specific doctrine, institution, or recent case in Australia (or elsewhere) where this “multidimensional observer who obstructs” reasoning is being invoked to shield abusers, give me the details and I can examine the exact legal or policy angle. The general principle, however, remains unchanged: belief is free; using it to deny victims their rights is not.

Others in this series

The Denial of Procedural Fairness through claims of Religious Protections or Freedom of Religion or its Beliefs V1
The Denial of Procedural Fairness through claims of Religious Protections or Freedom of Religion or its Beliefs V2
The Denial of Procedural Fairness through claims of Religious Protections or Freedom of Religion or its Beliefs V3

2023 Findings in Spain found that 0.6% of the population of Spain had been sexually abused by Roman Catholic priests and laity. Up to 50 million alive on any day who have been raped or abused by Catholic clergy &/or Catholic laity

Current world population is 8 billion - 0.6% = 48 million alive today who are likely to have been raped by Catholics globally.

The church protected the perpetrators, not the victims

"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more

If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.

Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or with absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.

Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance on the issue ...

Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.

  Constitutional Reform     Human Rights     Living Constitution     Constitution Field Guide     Corruption      Whistleblowers     Medical Research     Clinical Trials   

Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.

Recent:

#1041 The Denial of Procedural Fairness through claims of Religious Protections or Freedom of Religion or its Beliefs V3

#1040 The Denial of Procedural Fairness through claims of Religious Protections or Freedom of Religion or its Beliefs V2

#1039 The Denial of Procedural Fairness through claims of Religious Protections or Freedom of Religion or its Beliefs V1

#1038 What Would It Take to Make Your Ideal Australia?

#1037 Interview Responses from Christopher Longhurst to questions from John Brown

#1036 Marita Murphy: A Survivor's Unfiltered Voice – Justice Denied, But Not Silent

Must reads on

#763 Estimating the numbers global

#826 RFG: Accountability and responsibility of charities in providing care and justice to abuse survivors

#756 RFG: Advancing Parliamentary Pathways for Facilitating Disassociation from the Roman Catholic Church

#50 Yours, mine and Australia's children

#116 Human Rights and survivors of childhood sexual abuse by clergy a farce in Australia

#142 How aware are Australians of the truth of the cover up of the sexual abuse of children in 2018?

#157 Australian Constitution Hijacked into Empowering Criminal Clergy

#825 RFG: Foreign state has harmful impact on Mental Health of many Australians

#818 RFG: Career Cougers, Angel protectors or just Private School Mums

#574 It's not a lot to ask when the Human Rights of children are at stake

Mother and baby home survivors on redress delay: 'They are playing a game of wait and die'
Consultants reported more than 520 conflicts of interest during audit of Australian aged care

2024 is the year of Survivor's High Court challenge of the legitimacy of the Catholic Church and its religion on the basis of its primary allegiance and obedience to a foreign state.

Were you like so many others born into a constitutionally protected God based death and rape culture?

About and bits

The FAQyMe Gene happily uses IP2Location.io IP geolocation web service.