Friday, 16 January 2026 — If Today Were My Last Upright Day

I read a piece this week by Andrew on “the coercion script” — the way “care” can be turned into a weapon for control. It landed in my chest with a familiar weight: the pain of not being believed, the exhaustion of being handled as a problem, and the quiet terror of realising that people who “should know better” can still choose expedience over truth.

His plight touched me deeply. Not because his story is identical to mine, but because it rhymes. And in that rhyme there is a strange reassurance: I am not imagining the pattern. I am not alone in recognising it. Some of us learn, too late, that the most dangerous words in a system are not always shouted — they are politely delivered, professionally packaged, and recorded as “concern”.

I slept well last night after a hot shower. That sounds small, but right now small is not small. Sleep is a foothold. Breath is a foothold. A calm hour is a foothold. And when you have lived through prolonged disbelief and power imbalance, you learn to treat footholds as sacred.

Tomorrow’s Task: One Ordinary Errand With Unordinary Weight

Friday matters because I am trying to do something most people take for granted: get to the post office and back safely. I need to have my identity authenticated so I can access data — records — that I believe can show the truth of my experience with the health system for what it is.

I do not know if I will manage the journey. I do not know if my body will cooperate, or if pain and breathlessness will collapse the attempt before it begins. When you are dealing with illness, injury, and the after-effects of institutional harm, “going out” is not a simple outing. It can be a negotiation with gravity, fear, fatigue, and the knowledge that if something goes wrong, you may not be met with compassion. You may be met with a script.

And yet: I am hopeful. Hopeful enough to write this in the first hours of Friday, before the day gets away from me. Hopeful enough to keep trying to gather proof, not because I should have to prove myself, but because I have learned what happens when you don’t. Systems default to whatever protects themselves.

The Cruelty of the “Coercion Script”

The coercion script doesn’t always look like cruelty. It often looks like efficiency. It looks like professionals speaking over you while saying they are “listening”. It looks like quick questions that are not questions at all — they are prompts designed to funnel you into a predetermined conclusion.

It can sound like:

   “Are you OK?” asked too fast to hear the answer.
   “We’re just concerned,” while choices are quietly removed.
   “This is for your safety,” while your dignity is treated as optional.
   “You’re refusing care,” when you are actually requesting humane conditions for care.
   “We can’t help you if you won’t comply,” when compliance is being used as leverage, not as medicine.

The most corrosive part is not a single moment; it is the accumulation — the drip-feed of invalidation that teaches a person to doubt their own perceptions, to second-guess their own reality, and to anticipate punishment for speaking plainly.

And then, when you finally do speak plainly, you are told your plain speech is the problem.

If This Truly Were My Last Day Upright

People say we should live each day as though it could be our last. I don’t think many truly do. I know I haven’t — not consistently. We keep living because we expect tomorrow to arrive. We plan because we assume continuity. That assumption is a quiet mercy, right up until it isn’t.

So if this were my last day as an upright bipedal hominin — if this were the final day I could stand, walk, travel, or advocate — what would I say?

I would say this:

I have been trying to tell the truth in a world that often prefers convenience. I have been trying to live with integrity in systems that sometimes reward silence more than honesty. I have been trying to stay human inside processes that can become mechanical.

I would say that my life has not been defined by my suffering, even when suffering has been present. I have built. I have learned. I have tried to turn pain into something useful: records, frameworks, language, evidence, and support for others.

I would say: do not confuse my insistence on dignity with “difficulty”. Do not confuse my demand for proper process with “paranoia”. Do not confuse my trauma-informed caution with “noncompliance”. And do not confuse your authority with truth.

I would say: if you work in healthcare, you hold more than credentials. You hold power over frightened people — often people who have already been harmed by institutions. Your words can heal or harm. Your paperwork can protect or punish. Your choices can restore a person’s agency or erase it. Choose carefully.

What I Am Asking For (And What I Am Not Asking For)

I am not asking for pity. Pity is cheap and temporary.

I am asking for recognition, for records, for transparency, and for human treatment in human systems. I am asking that my experience be allowed to exist in full detail — without minimisation, without ridicule, without rewriting.

I am asking for the truth to be visible, because visibility is where accountability begins.

Sovereignty Segment

Sovereignty matters here — both personal and national.

Personal sovereignty means a person retains agency over their body, their story, and their decisions, even when they are unwell, even when they are distressed, even when they are inconvenient. “Care” that removes agency through pressure, threats, or procedural ambush is not care; it is control wearing a stethoscope.

National sovereignty means institutions operating within Australia must be answerable to Australian law, Australian standards of accountability, and the public interest — not protected by silence, closed networks, or external influence. Where institutional power overrides the rights of citizens, sovereignty is weakened. And when sovereignty is weakened, justice becomes optional.

If any official response to my situation ignores sovereignty — personal or national — then it is not responding to the core harm.

A Note to Whoever Reads This

If you are a clinician, administrator, advocate, investigator, or policymaker: please understand that “the coercion script” is not abstract theory. It is lived experience. It is the moment a person realises the room has decided who they are before they speak.

If you are a survivor reading this: I believe you. I know what it is to be told you are exaggerating, misremembering, overreacting, or “difficult”. I know the loneliness of trying to remain coherent while being treated as unreliable. I know that sometimes the most radical act is simply to keep your own record and not surrender your story.

Today, my next step is ordinary: a post office, an identity check, a request for records. But the meaning is not ordinary. The meaning is this:

I am still here. I am still seeking truth. I am still insisting on dignity, and I still want to advocate for the rights of children and in doing that I am fulfilling my own wants and needs in saying that I can find nothing more important to do with my time and my last moments on this planet than to plead for the real needs of the children of humanity.

If Friday goes well, I will continue. If Friday does not go well, let this stand as a marker: I tried to do it properly. I tried to do it peacefully. I tried to do it within process. And I am writing this so the record exists beyond any one institution’s file.

— John Anthony Brown
Brisbane, Australia — 16 January 2026

Find me on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social

Copyright The FAQyMe Gene © 2026 . Trauma in Religion - Site Map XML Site Map