« 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 »
In Australia government funded and supported institutions, and their clergy bound by doctrine and oaths of allegiance to a foreign Vatican sovereign daily act with impunity to pervert justice, minimise and cloak rape in eternal secrecy, prioritizing papal loyalty over truth, victims and national law.
#988
Part 1
PUBLISHED: November 18, 2025 06:06:11 AM UPDATED: No Updates
No-win no-fee (also called conditional fee agreements in the UK) or contingency fee setups mean lawyers only get paid if the case succeeds, typically via a percentage of the compensation. This opens access for survivors who might otherwise avoid legal action due to financial barriers. In the US, fees often range from 25-40% of the recovery, with no upfront payments. In the UK, success fees can add up to 25% deducted from damages, but defendants usually cover most legal costs if you win. Key to these is evaluating firm-specific terms, as some cover all expenses while others may require after-the-event insurance to protect against loss.
Based on web research and firm disclosures, here's a snapshot of prominent firms handling clergy and institutional abuse on no-win no-fee/contingency bases. Selection focused on those with proven track records in abuse cases, positive reviews, and available details. Note: Exact contract percentages are rarely public and vary by case; typical industry ranges are noted where specifics are absent.
| Firm | Location | Fee Structure | Costs Covered | Client Protections | Pros | Cons | KPIs (e.g., Settlements, Reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenner Law | US (Nationwide) | Contingency: 25-40% typical; no fee unless win/settle. | No out-of-pocket; firm advances expenses. | Privacy emphasis, personalized service, no class actions to avoid dilution. | Experienced in clergy cases; compassionate handling per testimonials; focuses on justice beyond money. | Limited public detail on exact percentages; may push for settlements in complex cases like bankrupt dioceses. | Over many verdicts/settlements; 4.9/5 rating on TrustAnalytica; positive feedback on communication and ethics. |
| Levy Konigsberg | US (Michigan-focused, nationwide) | Contingency: No fee unless win; 33-40% industry norm. | No upfront costs. | Trauma-informed approach; anonymity options. | Massive recoveries in institutional abuse (e.g., $490M University of Michigan, $500M Michigan State). | Less emphasis on individual clergy specifics; high-volume firm may feel less personalized. | Over $3B in sex abuse compensation; strong success in group settlements. |
| Greenberg Gross (Fight for Survivors) | US (California/Nationwide) | Contingency: Fees only after compensation; 30-40% typical. | Firm covers litigation costs upfront. | Anonymity under CA law; client-paced discussions; trial preparation focus. | Wins "unwinnable" cases; empathetic team; 5-star reviews for clear communication. | Total recoveries ($300M+) strong but less abuse-specific data. | Top lawyer recognitions; client reviews praise trust and results. |
| Bolt Burdon Kemp | UK | No-win no-fee (Conditional Fee Agreement); success fee up to 25% of damages. | Defendant pays most if win; after-the-event insurance recommended. | Confidentiality protocols; therapy access; trust setup for benefits protection. | Landmark cases changing abuse law; bespoke service; free initial assessment. | Claims can take 1-2+ years due to evidence challenges. | Settlements in hundreds of thousands; 4.8/5 Trustpilot; testimonials on life-changing results. |
| Thompsons Scotland | UK (Scotland) | No-win no-fee; no charges if lose. | No upfront; covers if unsuccessful. | Anonymity in proceedings; trauma-informed; charity partnerships for support. | Highest abuse awards in Scotland; leading Court of Session cases. | Focused on historical abuse; may require court if settlement fails. | 4.9/5 average (2,200+ reviews); settled most in Celtic FC class action. |
| Irwin Mitchell | UK | No-win no-fee; success fee deducted from award. | Defendant covers if win; insurance for protection. | Specialist team for vulnerable clients; access to support services. | First UK firm for £1M+ historic abuse award; high success in social services claims. | Processes can be lengthy for complex institutional cases. | Landmark Court of Appeal wins; positive reviews for sensitivity (4.7/5 average). |
This table draws from firm websites, reviews, and industry samples. Pros often include risk-free access and motivated lawyers; cons involve potential fee deductions reducing net awards.
These arrangements democratize justice but aren't perfect. Pros: No financial risk upfront, enabling claims for those without means; lawyers are incentivized to win, often advancing costs; broad access in sensitive abuse cases. Cons: If successful, the lawyer's cut (e.g., 33%) can significantly reduce your award; potential for attorneys to favor quick settlements over maximum compensation; in the UK, without insurance, you might owe costs if you lose. Reviews highlight empathy as a pro in abuse-specific firms, but some note delays as a con.
A comparison platform could use a scorecard: Rate firms on fee transparency (e.g., capped percentages), cost protections (e.g., full coverage), KPIs (win rates >80%, average awards >£100K/$150K), and survivor rights (e.g., veto on settlements). This could evolve into a custom contract builder, incorporating best practices like those below.
Survivors of clergy and institutional abuse face profound challenges in seeking justice, often compounded by financial barriers and power imbalances. No-win no-fee (UK) or contingency fee (US) arrangements have become standard, allowing claims without upfront payments. This white paper, based on extensive web research, compares contracts from key firms, outlines pros/cons, and proposes a system for survivors to compare terms and KPIs. It also explores enhancing assessments with custom co-signed contracts focused on rights and needs, drawing from legal samples, survivor feedback, and best practices. Aim: Shift from firm-centric models to survivor-empowered ones, promoting transparency and equity.
Clergy abuse typically involves sexual misconduct by religious figures, often in institutions like the Catholic Church, with notable US scandals (e.g., Baltimore Archdiocese bankruptcy) and UK cases (e.g., historic church claims). Institutional abuse extends to schools, care homes, and sports clubs, where cover-ups enable harm. Laws like the US Child Victims Act or UK redress schemes have extended statutes of limitations, enabling more claims. No-win no-fee models are crucial here, as survivors may lack resources amid trauma. Research from sources like CHILD USA and UK Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse highlights systemic issues, with settlements reaching billions (e.g., $3B+ by Levy Konigsberg).
Drawing from firm disclosures, reviews (e.g., Trustpilot, Yelp), and sample agreements, we analyzed six firms (three US, three UK) for relevance to abuse cases. Contracts aren't publicly shared in full, but terms are inferred from websites and legal norms.
US Firms (Contingency Fees):
UK Firms (No-Win No-Fee/Conditional Fees):
General Pros/Cons Across Firms: From legal analyses (e.g., LegalMatch, Sweeney Merrigan):
Table of KPIs (Sourced from Firm Sites/Reviews):
| Metric | Jenner Law | Levy Konigsberg | Greenberg Gross | Bolt Burdon Kemp | Thompsons Scotland | Irwin Mitchell |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win Rate (Est.) | High (per testimonials) | 90%+ in mass torts | Strong in "unwinnable" | High in appeals | Leading in Scotland | High in historic claims |
| Avg. Award | Undisclosed; multi-million verdicts | $100K-$M+ (e.g., $490M group) | $300M total recoveries | £100K+ | Highest in field | £1M+ precedents |
| Review Rating | 4.9/5 | 4.8/5 | 5/5 | 4.8/5 | 4.9/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Case Volume | Moderate | High | Moderate | High | High | High |
To empower potential clients, a digital platform could allow side-by-side contract reviews:
Standard contracts often prioritize firms; a custom model co-signed by survivor and lawyer could focus on needs. Key clauses (from samples like State Bar of California, Victim Rights Law Center):
2023 Findings in Spain found that 0.6% of the population of Spain had been sexually abused by Roman Catholic priests and laity. Up to 50 million alive on any day who have been raped or abused by Catholic clergy &/or Catholic laity
Current world population is 8 billion - 0.6% = 48 million alive today who are likely to have been raped by Catholics globally.
The church protected the perpetrators, not the victims
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or
with
absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than
any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob
Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a
small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance
on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
Constitutional Reform Human Rights Living Constitution Constitution Field Guide Corruption Whistleblowers Medical Research Clinical Trials
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
Mother and baby home survivors on redress delay:
'They are playing a game of wait and die'
Consultants
reported more than 520 conflicts of interest during audit of Australian aged care
2024 is the year of Survivor's High Court challenge of the legitimacy of the Catholic Church and its religion on the basis of its primary allegiance and obedience to a foreign state.
The FAQyMe Gene happily uses IP2Location.io IP geolocation web service.