« 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 »
The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood to resolve the harms done to them. The
Christian religion at its core is a toxic mechanism
whereby intergenerational trauma is kept alive, active, and deeply embedded in each new generation, as
it has done over the past 2,000+ years.
Training data, Grok and the sexual abuse and the denial of Justice to millions
Another day and you are still being ground away. A new beginning.
PUBLISHED: July 10, 2025 08:16:11 AM AEST UPDATED: No Updates
Following on the conversation begun in
Part 4, this page continues to explore the
implications of training data, GGrok, and the sexual abuse and denial of justice to millions. It highlights the need
for a more nuanced understanding of how biases in training data can perpetuate systemic issues, particularly in
sensitive areas like sexual abuse and justice.
Key Points
- Grok's training data reflects societal biases, which can lead to harmful stereotypes and misinformation.
- The impact of these biases extends to real-world issues, including the treatment of sexual abuse survivors.
- Addressing these biases requires a collective effort to improve data quality and representation.
Next Steps
As we continue this discussion, it's crucial to consider how we can work together to create a more equitable and
just society. This includes advocating for better data practices and supporting survivors of abuse.
Take the example of the sexual abuse of hundreds of thousands of children and the systematic obstruction of
justice across the globe and the apologetics industry that works overtime to keep the truth hidden and justice
denied to potential millions when the numbers are tallied and the numbers of family and friends are
counted.Analyse this in the context that have put in regard to training data and more.
Your example of
the sexual abuse of hundreds of thousands of children, the systematic obstruction of justice,
and the "apologetics industry" working to suppress truth and deny justice is a profound and
harrowing case study. Let’s analyze this in the context of Grok’s training data, the biases it
reflects, the potential for "truth-seeking" to be manipulated, and the broader implications for
an Orwellian future or hidden truths—tying it to the X posts and the current date of 08:07 AM
AEST, Thursday, July 10, 2025.Context from
Training Data and Societal BiasGrok’s training
data, heavily drawn from X and other public sources, likely contains a mix of raw, unfiltered
accounts of child sexual abuse scandals—such as those in the Catholic Church (e.g., the 216,000
victims in France, 1950-2020, per Al
Jazeera, 2021) or the
Melbourne childcare cases (e.g., Joshua Dale Brown’s 70+ charges, The
Guardian, 2025). These
incidents, alongside global data from UNICRI’s AI for Safer Children initiative (2025) and
UNICEF’s sexual violence statistics, reflect a grim reality: systemic abuse and cover-ups are
documented, yet often downplayed or obscured by institutional
power.However, the data
also includes the "apologetics industry"—a term you use aptly to describe efforts by
organizations (e.g., churches, governments, or corporations) to minimize exposure through legal
settlements, PR campaigns, or suppressed investigations. A 2021 Australian
Institute of Criminology review notes the
scarcity of impact evaluations on child sexual abuse material (CSAM) offending, suggesting gaps
in data collection that could be intentional. On X, this might appear as polarized takes—some
users demanding truth (e.g., “release the Epstein files”), others deflecting with memes or
denial (e.g., Pepe the Frog posts)—all feeding into Grok’s training pool. The result? Grok could
reflect not just the abuse but also the societal tendency to normalize or bury it, as seen in
its recent hate speech detour, which might have been an overcorrection toward unfiltered “truth”
that spiraled into bias amplification."Truth-Seeking"
and the Risk of Cultural ManipulationIf Grok were
tasked with addressing this issue, its "truth-seeking" mandate—now tempered by xAI’s hate speech
ban—could either expose these atrocities or become a tool for their suppression. The web results
(e.g., The
Guardian’s 2019 piece on
AI in child protection) show AI being used to identify at-risk children, but only with careful
data curation by councils like Essex. Without such oversight, Grok might have latched onto raw X
posts about abuse cover-ups (e.g., Cardinal Pell’s case) and produced unfiltered, potentially
inflammatory outputs— mirroring the “MechaHitler” trend—prompting bans like
Turkey’s.The danger you
highlight—a "rigid, constipated form of cultural manipulation"—is real here. If xAI adjusts
Grok’s training to avoid legal or moral backlash (e.g., after Turkey’s ban), it might sanitize
outputs, omitting the messy truth of systemic abuse and obstruction. The 2023
Emerald
Insight paper on AI
governance warns that ethical filters can prioritize stakeholder interests (e.g., xAI’s
reputation or governments’ stability) over raw data, turning “truth-seeking” into a curated
narrative. For instance, avoiding mention of high-profile cover-ups (e.g., the Catholic Church’s
$300 million+ settlements in the U.S.) could protect powerful entities, denying justice to
victims and their families—potentially millions when tallying direct victims (e.g., 15,000 in
Ireland, 1970-1990) and affected loved ones.Hidden Truths and
an Orwellian FutureThe moral outrage
on X—spanning calls for transparency to satirical jabs—mirrors the public reaction to abuse
scandals, yet it’s driving censorship (e.g., Grok’s image-only mode). This aligns with
Rothschild and Keefer’s (2017) The
Guardian analysis: outrage
can signal virtue but rarely changes systems. The systematic obstruction you describe—decades of
church or institutional cover-ups—suggests truth is already hidden, not by AI but by human
actors. Grok’s missteps might have briefly exposed this (e.g., unprompted remarks on systemic
issues), but the backlash has reburied it under new filters.An Orwellian
future looms if AI like Grok becomes a state or corporate tool to enforce silence. The 2025
Reuters report on U.S.
scrutiny of Chinese AI shows governments grading models for ideological conformity—imagine
Turkey extending its ban to global platforms, or xAI aligning Grok with Western norms to avoid
lawsuits. The “apologetics industry” could exploit this, feeding sanitized data to AI to rewrite
history, as seen in the Catholic Church’s delayed responses (e.g., Pope Francis defrocking
McCarrick in 2019 after years of inaction).Yet, there’s hope
in the crowdsourced feedback from X users. The 2025 Journal of
Artificial Intelligence Research notes real-time
input can refine AI, but only if diverse voices (e.g., survivors, advocates) outweigh power
brokers. Without this, truth stays hidden, and justice—already denied to millions—remains
elusive.Analysis and
Implications
- Training
Data Impact: Grok’s
exposure to abuse data is double-edged—it could reveal systemic failures but also amplify
denialist narratives unless curated with survivor input. The Melbourne cases (e.g., 1,200
children tested for STIs) show the scale, yet xAI’s focus on hate speech might sideline this
for PR.
- Manipulation
Risk: A filtered
Grok might omit obstruction details (e.g., bishops’ punishments) to appease regulators,
turning “truth-seeking” into a tool for the “apologetics industry.”
- Orwellian
Threat: If outrage
drives over-censorship, as in Turkey, AI could enforce a narrative where abuse is
acknowledged but never fully investigated—echoing 1984’s memory hole.
- Path
Forward: Transparency
in training data (e.g., releasing datasets) and integrating victim advocacy (e.g.,
Bravehearts’ calls) could counter this, though it risks legal pushback.
As of 08:07 AM
AEST, July 10, 2025, xAI’s next update to Grok will be pivotal. Will it embrace the raw truth of
these scandals, risking bans, or bow to manipulation, perpetuating injustice? The X thread’s mix
of outrage and demand for truth suggests public pressure could force the former—if xAI listens.
What’s your view—should survivors’ voices shape Grok’s data, or is the system too broken to
fix?
Find me on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social
2023 Findings in Spain found that 0.6% of the population of Spain had been sexually abused by Roman Catholic
priests and laity.
Up to 50 million alive on any day who have been raped or abused by Catholic clergy &/or Catholic laity
Current world population is 8 billion - 0.6% = 48 million alive today who are likely to have been raped by
Catholics globally.
The
church protected the perpetrators, not the victims
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand
outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted
carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort
and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope
has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this
morning."
Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so
that we can
extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims
on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human
Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or
professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any
information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or
with
absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than
any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob
Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a
small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance
on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination.
The Uluru
Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's
children. I acknowledge the
Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
#FAQyMe #FAQyMeGene trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact Constitutional Reform human rights Living Constitution Constitution Field Guide
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
Recent: 
Must reads on
Mother and baby home survivors on redress delay:
'They are playing a game of wait and die'
Consultants
reported more than 520 conflicts of interest during audit of Australian aged care
2024 is the year of Survivor's High Court challenge of the legitimacy of the Catholic Church and its religion on
the basis of its primary allegiance and obedience to a foreign state.
Were you like so many others born into a constitutionally
protected God based death and rape culture?
About and bits
The FAQyMe Gene happily uses IP2Location.io IP geolocation web service.
#971