« 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 »
The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood. The Christian religion at its core is a toxic mechanism whereby intergenerational trauma is kept alive, active, and deeply embedded in each new generation, as it has done over the past 2,000+ years.
#878
Hello John search=/about878.php :: 28 - /about878.php :: db-stats-28:: db-stats-page-links :: archive /about878.php
A variety of political, cultural, and historical factors, as reflected in both broader societal sentiments and specific concerns raised on Social Media.
PUBLISHED: October 27, 2024 29:09:08 PM UPDATED: No Updates
A Living Bill of Rights would be a transformative step towards creating a government that genuinely serves the people, adapts to modern challenges, and reflects Australia’s evolving values and aspirations.
Here’s why it’s urgently needed:
Our Constitution is Outdated and Inflexible
Australia’s Constitution was written over a century ago and reflects the concerns and values of an era long past. Today, Australians live in a vastly different world with new challenges—from climate change to digital privacy to social equality—that demand a modern response. A Living Bill of Rights would allow us to update and refine our guiding principles in real time, ensuring our foundational laws are relevant and responsive.
True Representation of the People, by the People
A Living Bill of Rights could shift us away from party-driven, winner-takes-all politics toward a more direct form of democracy. Elected officials would no longer simply follow the party line but instead would be bound to represent the will of their constituents on each piece of legislation. This model would empower Australians to have a direct voice on issues, holding representatives accountable to the electorate instead of party elites or wealthy donors.
Reducing the Influence of Money and Corruption
Current systems allow money and connections to play a large role in elections, creating a "democracy" where the loudest, wealthiest voices are often heard most clearly. A Living Bill of Rights could include provisions for transparency, public campaign financing, and limits on corporate donations, all of which would help level the playing field and ensure that elections reflect the will of ordinary Australians rather than powerful interest groups.
Freedom from Endless Wars and Militarization
Australians should not be drawn into conflicts that do not serve the nation’s interests or values. A Living Bill of Rights could enshrine the right to peace and prioritize diplomacy and peaceful resolution over military action. Such a principle would reflect the values of many Australians who want their government to prioritize human welfare and international cooperation over weapons manufacturing and foreign wars.
Harnessing Technology for Participatory Democracy
Technology now gives us the tools to enable more direct and continuous participation in governance. Through secure digital platforms, Australians could have the ability to vote on key issues, give feedback on legislation, and directly influence decisions that affect their lives. A Living Bill of Rights could lay the groundwork for a form of digital governance that brings democracy into the 21st century—one where every generation can make its voice heard, rather than being bound by decisions made in the past.
Protecting the Vulnerable and Ensuring Equity
The current system has too often protected the interests of the powerful at the expense of the vulnerable. A Living Bill of Rights could enshrine protections for essential human rights, including healthcare, housing, education, and a clean environment. Such a document would set a national standard for human dignity and social equity, ensuring that no one is left behind in the pursuit of economic growth or political gain.
What a Living Bill of Rights Could Include
To achieve this vision, a Living Bill of Rights might contain the following elements:Fundamental Rights and Freedoms: Protection for freedom of speech, privacy, assembly, and belief, adapted to modern contexts like digital expression and data privacy.
Environmental Protections: The right to a healthy environment and legal standards to combat climate change, so that future generations inherit a sustainable planet.
Social and Economic Rights: Guarantees for access to healthcare, education, housing, and a livable wage, ensuring every Australian has the foundation for a decent life.
Digital Rights and Governance: The right to secure, accessible digital participation in governance, as well as protections for online privacy and freedom from digital surveillance.
Checks on Military Engagement: Provisions to prevent Australia from entering military conflicts without clear justification and democratic consent.
Election and Governance Reform: Rules to limit the influence of money in politics, ensure transparency, and encourage proportional representation so that all voices are fairly heard.
Addressing Criticisms and Concerns
Critics might argue that a Living Bill of Rights would make governance too complex, or that it would undermine the stability provided by a fixed Constitution. However, it’s important to note that many of the world’s most effective democracies—like New Zealand, Canada, and much of Europe—have bills of rights or constitutional mechanisms that are regularly updated through judicial interpretation or legislative action. Flexibility doesn’t mean chaos; it means that Australia can better respond to contemporary needs, rather than being hamstrung by outdated laws.
Additionally, the implementation of a Living Bill of Rights could be carefully designed to maintain essential principles and avoid constant, unnecessary changes. Only those amendments supported by widespread public demand—demonstrated through referendums or digital engagement—would be added, preserving stability while allowing progress.
Moving Forward as a Nation
Australia has the opportunity to lead the way in building a new model of democracy—one that values the voices of all citizens, not just the wealthy and powerful, and one that is equipped to meet the challenges of the future.
A Living Bill of Rights would empower Australians to take collective responsibility for their country’s direction and ensure that our government serves as a true instrument of the people’s will.
This vision for a Living Bill of Rights isn’t just about adding rights and protections; it’s about making Australia’s democracy as dynamic, fair, and responsive as the people it serves. With a new approach to governance, Australia can move away from partisan entrenchment and toward a society that’s genuinely by and for the people.
Additional things that others have noted include Nationalising the healthcare system, housing and the education system would be good. https://x.com/hartsea82
2023 Findings in Spain found that 0.6% of the population of Spain had been sexually abused by Roman Catholic priests and laity. Up to 50 million alive on any day who have been raped or abused by Catholic clergy &/or Catholic laity
Current world population is 8 billion - 0.6% = 48 million alive today who are likely to have been raped by Catholics globally.
The church protected the perpetrators, not the victims
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or
with
absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than
any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob
Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a
small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance
on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
#FAQyMe #FAQyMeGene trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact Constitutional Reform human rights Living Constitution Constitution Field Guide
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
.
Mother and baby home survivors on redress delay:
'They are playing a game of wait and die'
Consultants
reported more than 520 conflicts of interest during audit of Australian aged care
2024 is the year of Survivor's High Court challenge of the legitimacy of the Catholic Church and its religion on the basis of its primary allegiance and obedience to a foreign state.