The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood. The Christian religion at it's core is a toxic mechanism whereby intergenerational trauma has been kept alive, active and deeply embedded in each new generation over the past 2,000+ years.
PUBLISHED: January 6, 2024 11:10:03 PM
Task: Produce a Critical Examination of Religious Freedom: The priority of which is to prevent religious freedom from being weaponized as a shield for illegal and unethical activities. In all instances we must ensure that we have protected all children and that their human right to be free to self-determination is a core requirement.
The balance between respecting beliefs and ensuring those beliefs do not harm others or impede justice must begin from the default state and provide a potential route to return to that default state of us modern day Homo sapiens. Accordingly, the aim is to provide safety to return to that default in our communities ensuring that the default remains just that.
The default is to trust, and it is in providing that trust that we have failed to provide safety to our children in the past and in the present moment. Ensure this examination fills those requirements to the fullest extent possible before it seeks to consider the rights or beliefs of others and subsequent institutional engagements in social services, health and education in an Australian context.
It would be unethical to accept input at full value from Institutions who have been found to be complicit in covering up or enabling criminal actions against children and the vulnerable in society.
A critical examination of religious freedom, especially in the context of protecting children and preventing the misuse of this freedom as a shield for illegal and unethical activities, is a complex and multifaceted issue. It involves a delicate balance between respecting individual and institutional rights to religious freedom and ensuring these rights do not facilitate harm or impede justice. This balance is particularly pertinent in Australia, where issues related to religious institutions and child safety have been prominently discussed.
1. Religious Freedom and Its Limits
Religious freedom is a fundamental human right recognized in international law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It encompasses the freedom to practice one's religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance. However, this right is not absolute and can be subject to limitations necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
2. Protection of Children and Vulnerable Groups
The protection of children and vulnerable groups is a paramount consideration. This aligns with various international conventions, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which obligates states to protect children from abuse and exploitation. In the context of religious freedom, this means that practices or beliefs that harm children or vulnerable individuals must be scrutinized and, if necessary, curtailed.
3. Australian Context and Historical Precedents
In Australia, several inquiries, such as the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, have highlighted the misuse of religious authority to perpetrate and conceal abuse. These findings underscore the need for robust mechanisms to ensure religious institutions do not use their status to evade accountability.
4. Ensuring Institutional Accountability
There is a growing recognition of the need for religious institutions to be transparent and accountable, especially when they provide social services, health, and education. This accountability is essential not just in preventing abuse but also in addressing it effectively when it occurs.
5. Ethical Considerations in Engaging with Complicit Institutions
Engaging with institutions found complicit in abuse poses ethical challenges. While it is vital to hold these institutions accountable, completely disengaging with them can also have adverse effects, especially if they play significant roles in community support and services. A nuanced approach is required, one that seeks reformation and restitution while safeguarding against future abuses.
6. Recommendations for Safeguarding Religious Freedom and Child Protection
Robust Legal Frameworks: Implementing and enforcing laws that clearly delineate the limits of religious freedom in the context of child safety. Transparency and Accountability: Requiring religious institutions to adhere to stringent standards of transparency and accountability. Child Safety Policies: Mandating that religious institutions adopt comprehensive child safety policies. Regular Audits and Inspections: Conducting regular audits and inspections of religious institutions, especially those involved in child-related services. Victim Support and Redress: Providing robust support systems for victims of abuse and ensuring access to justice. Public Awareness and Education: Promoting public awareness about the risks and ensuring educational programs are in place to prevent abuse.
Balancing religious freedom with the need to protect children and vulnerable individuals from harm is a challenging yet essential task. In the Australian context, this balance requires a firm commitment to accountability and transparency, particularly in dealing with institutions that have historically failed in their duty of care. The focus must always remain on protecting the rights and safety of the most vulnerable, ensuring that religious freedom does not become a refuge for those who seek to exploit or harm others.
User when these institutions play significant roles in community support and services there must be human rights issues, moral issues, ethical issues in instances where health and care systems are provided by those same institutions - this needs to be included
Indeed, when religious institutions play significant roles in community support and services, especially in areas like health and care systems, the interplay between their religious identity and the provision of these essential services raises significant human rights, moral, and ethical issues.
This becomes particularly complex in instances where such institutions have a history of unethical conduct or abuse, as it challenges the trust and safety that the community, especially vulnerable groups, should be able to expect from these providers.
Human Rights Issues
Right to Accessible and Non-Discriminatory Services: Individuals have the right to access health and social services without discrimination. When religious institutions provide these services, they must do so in a way that respects the diverse beliefs and needs of all community members, regardless of their own religious doctrines.
Right to Privacy and Dignity: Patients and service users have a right to privacy and dignity in all healthcare and social service settings. Religious institutions must ensure that these rights are upheld, and that any religious practices or teachings do not infringe upon them.
Moral and Ethical Issues
Moral Responsibility to Protect the Vulnerable: There is a profound moral responsibility to protect the vulnerable, especially children, in all settings, including those run by religious institutions. This responsibility is heightened in cases where institutions have a history of abuse.
Ethical Provision of Services: Ethical provision of services entails delivering care that is not only clinically appropriate but also respectful of the diverse values and beliefs of individuals. Religious institutions must navigate the fine line between adhering to their religious values and respecting the autonomy and beliefs of those they serve.
Balancing Religious Identity with Service Provision
Separation of Doctrine and Care: While it is understood that religious institutions may have specific doctrines, the provision of care and services should be separate from religious teachings, especially when these services are funded by public money or are part of a public service obligation.
Inclusivity and Respect for Diversity: These institutions must foster an environment of inclusivity, where services are provided with respect for the cultural and religious diversity of the community.
Transparency and Accountability: Ensuring that religious institutions are transparent about their practices and are held accountable for any actions that contradict ethical standards or human rights principles is crucial.
In Australia, the intertwining of religious institutions in health and social services necessitates stringent regulations and oversight to ensure that these services are delivered ethically and without discrimination. The legacy of historical abuses adds an additional layer of responsibility to ensure that these institutions have reformed and are capable of providing safe, inclusive, and respectful services.
The involvement of religious institutions in providing essential community services such as healthcare and education requires a careful balance between respecting their religious identity and ensuring that their services meet ethical standards and respect human rights. This balance is critical to maintaining the trust of the community and ensuring that the rights and dignity of all individuals, particularly the most vulnerable, are protected.
We are working on an interestting perspective on this freeddom of religion aspect. Keep in touch as that should be published around the first week of February 2024.
The Reality Field Guide for Constitutional Change#JusticeReformed
Conflict of Interest: When an institution is both the alleged perpetrator of harm and the provider of care to the victims of that harm, there is a clear conflict of interest. This can undermine the trust in the care provided and potentially re-traumatize individuals seeking support.
Moral and Ethical Considerations: There is a moral and ethical imperative for care providers to act in the best interests of their clients. When the care provider is associated with the source of trauma, this can be compromised. Survivors might feel pressured to forgive or reconcile, which can impede their healing process.
Secular Society and Human Rights: In a secular society that upholds human rights, it's crucial that victims of abuse receive impartial and unbiased support. This includes access to services that are independent of the institutions involved in their trauma.
Legal and Human Rights Obligations: There may also be legal and human rights obligations to consider. It's important that survivors have access to justice and reparations, which can be hindered by conflicts of interest.
Transparency and Accountability: There needs to be transparency and accountability in how these institutions handle allegations of abuse and provide support to victims. Without this, there is a risk of perpetuating abuse and obstructing justice.
In light of these issues, it may be more appropriate for independent organizations, unaffiliated with any religious institution, to provide medical and mental health services to survivors of abuse. This would help to ensure that the care provided is free from conflicts of interest and aligned with the best interests of the survivors.
It's also important for secular societies to critically evaluate the role of religious institutions in public life, especially when it comes to issues of health and welfare, to ensure that human rights are respected and upheld.
2023 Findings in Spain found that 0.6% of the population of Spain had been sexually abused by Roman Catholic priests and laity. Being a 2024 Catholic in today's real world
Current world population is 8 billion - 0.6% = 48 million alive today who are likely to have been raped by Catholics globally.
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or with
absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than
any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob
Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means..
|John Brown RFG: Constitutional Reform
|John Brown RFG: Constitutional Reform 1
|John Brown RFG: Constitutional Reform 2
|Pat Mills Catholic Knights and Dirty Money - March 14, 2023
|John Brown RFG: Constitutional Reform 3
|Andrew Klein Child sexual abuse and the destruction of communities
|John Brown Assessing your Individual Common Adverse Religious Experiences (CARE)
|John Brown Adult Common Adverse Religious Experiences (A-CARE) Assessment
|Johl Brown Ade O'Maolain on Catholic child trafficking
|John Brown The intention to defraud the child of their human rights and human dignity begins with entrapment of the child
2024 is the year of Survivor's High Court challenge of the legitimacy of the Catholic Church and its religion on the basis of its primary allegiance and obedience to a foreign state.