under construction

Denial of our human reality || Health || Relationships || Work || Addiction || Solutions

Is a solution possible?

A possible solution to the problem of denial in the Christian belief system and its impact on society is to promote a culture of critical thinking, dialogue, and accountability among Christians and non-Christians alike. Critical thinking involves the ability to question, analyze, and evaluate one's own and others' beliefs, assumptions, and arguments, based on evidence, logic, and reason. Dialogue involves the willingness to listen, understand, and respect different perspectives, values, and experiences, without resorting to judgment, hostility, or violence. Accountability involves the responsibility to admit, correct, and learn from one's own and others' mistakes, errors, or wrongdoings, without denying, minimizing, or rationalizing them.

Critical thinking, dialogue, and accountability can help Christians and non-Christians to overcome denial by:

• Encouraging them to examine and challenge the sources, validity, and implications of their religious beliefs and practices, and to seek out and consider alternative or opposing views and evidence.

• Enabling them to communicate and collaborate with people from diverse backgrounds, cultures, and faiths, and to appreciate and celebrate their common humanity and dignity, as well as their differences and diversity.

• Empowering them to confront and address the problems and issues that affect them and their society, such as abuse, injustice, inequality, and violence, and to seek and implement solutions that are ethical, effective, and inclusive.

Critical thinking, dialogue, and accountability can also benefit Christians and non-Christians by:

• Enhancing their intellectual, emotional, and spiritual growth and development, and their capacity for creativity, innovation, and leadership.

• Fostering their sense of curiosity, wonder, and awe, and their appreciation for the beauty, complexity, and mystery of life and the universe.

• Inspiring their compassion, empathy, and solidarity, and their commitment to social justice, peace, and harmony.

Critical thinking, dialogue, and accountability are not incompatible with faith, but rather can enrich and deepen it, by making it more authentic, meaningful, and relevant. They are also not a threat to religious freedom, but rather a safeguard and a guarantee of it, by ensuring that it is exercised with respect, responsibility, and reciprocity. They are also not a sign of weakness, doubt, or disloyalty, but rather a mark of strength, courage, and integrity.

Therefore, the Australian parliament, as well as other institutions and organizations, such as schools, churches, media, and civil society, can play a vital role in promoting a culture of critical thinking, dialogue, and accountability among Christians and non-Christians, by providing education, information, and opportunities for them to engage in constructive and respectful exchanges and collaborations on various matters of public interest and concern. By doing so, they can help to overcome the problem of denial in the Christian belief system and its impact on society, and to create a more open, tolerant, and democratic society.

On the topic of our Environment

Tell us your views on the following:

1. Free Will
Do you believe that humans have free will and the power to shape their own destiny?

Yes No

2. God & Supreme Beings
Do you believe that there is a higher power or a transcendent reality that guides and supports the Universe?

Yes No

3. Keys to Human Survival
Do you believe that science, technology, and innovation are the keys to human progress and prosperity?

Yes No

4. Individual Choices
Do you believe that poverty, hunger, and inequality are the fault of individual choices and behaviors?

Yes No

5. Human Rights
Do you believe that violence, terrorism, and war are inevitable and unavoidable consequences of human nature?

Yes No

6. Human behaviours
Do you believe that democracy, human rights, and the rule of law are the best forms of governance and justice?

Yes No

7. Social Media
Do you believe that social media and the internet have a negative impact on your mental health, relationships, and well-being?

Yes No

8. Discrimination
Do you believe that racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of discrimination and oppression are prevalent and harmful in society and that they need to be addressed and eliminated?

Yes No

9. Climate Change
Do you believe that human activity is the main cause of climate change and that it poses a serious threat to the environment and humanity?

Yes No

10. COVID-19
Do you believe that the COVID-19 pandemic is a real and dangerous health crisis that requires collective action and responsibility to prevent and control?

Yes No

Would you like to anonymously submit your results to assist us in building statistics?
NOTE: Your comment will be readable to us.
(How we collect statistics) || (Why we collect statistics)

Yes No, only display results

Your Name (optional):

Comment (optional):

Calculate Your Score

Scoring Instructions:
For each question, assign a score of 1 for "Yes" and 0 for "No." Sum the total score upon completion.

0-2: Low Environment score; may indicate fewer adverse responses.

3-5: Moderate Environment score; suggests a higher level of adverse experiences that could potentially impact well-being.

6-10: High Environment score; indicates a significant number of adverse environmental experiences, which may correlate with more severe outcomes.

Interpretation:
The Environment score is a preliminary assessment tool designed to identify potential adverse experiences. It is not a diagnostic instrument but can be used to signal the need for a more comprehensive evaluation by a qualified professional.

The Environment score, is not a diagnostic tool but a screening method to identify potential risk factors that may contribute to later health or social problems. A high Environment score would suggest the need for further assessment and possibly professional support for dealing with the consequences of these adverse experiences.

It's important to note that the Environment score should be used with sensitivity and awareness of its limitations. It does not account for the resilience factors, support systems, or individual coping mechanisms that can mitigate the impact of adverse experiences. Professional interpretation and follow-up are crucial for individuals with moderate to high scores.

Privacy and Confidentiality:
Your responses are confidential. If you feel comfortable sharing this information, please know that it will be used to better understand the impact of adverse experiences and to recommend improvements to support services.

Home   Abstract  Hijacked  Achieved  Wanted   Map

Copyright TiR © 2024 . Trauma in Religion - Are Christian God based Solutions Possible? Site Map XML Site Map