Thursday, 22 April 2021 5:10:24 PM

Work in progress with formatting and display to come

Related: Transcript - Traumatized and venting on the Minister's words
Online submission to Sarah Mitchell NSW Minister for Children
Christian Police Minister publicly bullies frightened children

Transcript of the video

New South Wales minister on BLM signs at primary schools

An official investigation has begun on these signs from a Sydney primary school by year five and year six students.

Presenter: Good morning, Minister, what do you make of those signs?

Statement 2:

Minister for Police: Well it's very-very sad, I mean this is the sort of indoctrination that distorts our education system ¹. It's the sort of behavior coming from ideologues who work in the education department ² that want to skew what Australia stands for ³. I mean the attack on the police, New South Wales police and American police, New South Wales police are rebuilding the finest traditions of Westminster democracy. We have an independent civilian oversight of our police force through the law enforcement conduct commission. We have an apolitical police force. We have record numbers of indigenous and multi cultural communities wanting to join the police force because it reflects and responds to the needs of our great democracy.

indoctrination The process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.

1.1 : "indoctrination that distorts our education system"
It is my reasoning that the Minister is the one who is acting out as a result of indoctrination and I believe that it is incontrovertibly so. The Minister is demanding the dismissal of presumed innocent until proven guilty female teacher holding her responsible for the the fears and terrors that young children experience 24/7 in our connected world today.

The Minister and I have very different understandings as to how a secular democracy is supposed to work for all of us. How social safety is important to all of us and more so for those who are vulnerable.

These children are in no way attempting to indoctrinate. They are in fact holding up something that really frightens them and no amount of public bullying by the Minister should be required when these children have committed no crime and yet they are publicly accused and publicly denigrated as being some malformed incapable imbeciles and is demanding their immediate silence. It does not get much more Draconian than that. The Minister must stop publicly bullying children without evidence of a real crime having been committed. Then there would be an investigation and not just some reaction from the Minister to events that have obviously affected to a deep level.

The Minister for Police has clearly identified education as the problem and logically it follows that would also be it's point of origin. Case closed; they need publicly humiliating until they toe the line. How heroic of the Minister for Police to give such a live example of biased unprincipled unreasonable actions against women and children by powerful godly men in politics and policing. The Minister appears to want to direct education policies to ensure his form of indoctrination prevails. The Minister is no hero that any child should look up to.

Today children need greater assurance and greater clarity than ever before and the Minister has only muddied their waters by publicly denouncing the fact that children are frightened by events that are happening around them. They already live in fear of the greatest pandemic we have faced yet and they re publicly reviled and berated by the Minister for NSW Police. It is the Minister who is enforcing his bias and his own form of enforcing his personal and religious ideals in what is a matter that should be investigated by Police. The Minister is attempting to indoctrinate a false narrative and he is outraged and comes to that from his own words where he relates, connects and associates his reason from his religious beliefs. Beliefs that have no place in the conduct of policing other than to ensure that what the Minister is attempting to achieve should never be permitted to happen to vulnerable children in this way.

Does the Minister realize that we left those ways of educating in Australia back around the end of the Second World War? Does the Minister understand how out of touch he is on this?

1.2 The Minister is the one attempting to force his ideology by indoctrinating children and seemingly making unfounded claims with no evidence of misconduct disclosed. No specific criminal actions have been identified yet punitive action has already been taken by the Minister.

1.3 : "ideologues who work in the education department"

ideologue: an often blindly partisan advocate or adherent of a particular ideology. 2 : an impractical idealist : theorist.

The Minister has identified ideologues in the education department and he has found the primary culprit of this dastardly and heinous individual is a woman attempting to teach children how to manage and to navigate safely through their life and the Police Minister wants her sacked. He obviously has powerful evidence and obviously will be examining every school art class throughout the state leaving no stone unturned in his diligence and focus on a faulty task. The question as to whether the Police Minister is attempting to enforce his version of an idealized but dysfunctional form of Christianity and in doing that he can be seen to be the one attempting to respond by enforcing the Ministers own ideals as the loudest and most powerful ideologue. The Minister is very clear about that.

1.2 Unfounded ClaimNo supporting evidence has been made available.
Until the Minister can provide evidence of this it shall remain an unsupported claim of little interest to any court as no crime has yet to be shown to have been committed,

1.2 : "skew what Australia stands for"

1.2 is based on an Unfounded Claim. No supporting evidence has been made available.

It is valid to observe the implied values that all Australians stand for are not those described by the Minister. Again the Minister is misdirected. Dangerously misdirected.

Statement 2:

Minister for Police: And I can't believe that we've got these left wing teachers⁴ out there ⁵acting righteous ⁶ themselves, by saying white lives don't matter ⁷. Well they do. Everybody matters. And we should be concentrating on reading and writing in these schools and not this sort of political indoctrination ⁸?

2.4 : "left wing teachers" and the evidence is? Unsupported Claim

2.5 : "out there" Out where? This is vague and has no tangible value and can provide no support for or against anything. It provides no support for or evidence for any claim mad. Unsupported Claim

2.6 : "acting righteous" morally right or justifiable. The Ministers actions are neither morally right or justifiable. He should step down and keep his religious thoughts nand perspectives out of Police business..

2.7 : "saying white lives don't matter" Who specifically was saying white lives don't matter? Was it the children or the ideology driven left wing woman in charge?

2.8 : "this sort of political indoctrination" Yes Minister this sort of indoctrination is morally and likely legally wrong and a stop must be put to it.

Presenter: What will you do about it?

Statement 3:

Minister for Police: Well I've written to I'll be writing to the minister for education and the secretary of education today. Making it very-very clear that on behalf of the seventy thousand police officers across New South Wales, I think that they should be making a stand ⁹. This is not the way that we need to educate our children ¹⁰, our children should feel confident that when they go to the police to report sex crimes, when they go to the police to say there was non consensual activities with another person<, that when they go to police /strong> to report illegal drug activities ¹¹, well then they're going to be heard without fear or favor ¹². That they don't have to think of the police as some sort of boogey men¹³, which is what we're seeing with this sort of indoctrination ¹⁴.

3.9 : "I think that they should be making a stand"

3.10 : "not the way that we need to educate our children"

3.11 : "to report illegal drug activities"

3.12 : "be heard without fear or favor" The Minister's favour is the flavour of the dominant Christian religion

3.13 : "boogey men"

3.14 : "this sort of indoctrination"

of gray to the argument.

Statement 4:

Minister for Police: Well that's right, there isn't and that's what we get out of the left ¹⁵. I mean these are the same left wing ideologues ¹⁶ who will say every time an Australian soldier sets foot overseas it's not our war. ¹⁷ Well guess what. What's going on in America at the moment, it's not our war ¹⁸. We're Australians, we have much different relationship with the New South Wales police and police forces around the country. We have a much higher level of respect for our police because they are independent and they do have civilian oversight. So when they do do the wrong thing, there is a process. That doesn't happen in the United States, which is why I'm very-very concerned that our teachers are using what is happening in the United States to somehow muddy the waters here.

4.16 : "that's what we get out of the left" Irrelevant political statement unless there is supporting evidence of a criminal act

4.16 : "left wing ideologues" Irrelevant political and religious statement unless there is supporting evidence of a criminal act

4.17 : "every time an Australian soldier sets foot overseas it's not our war" Irrelevant and misleading statement. The Minister will be very busy if he thinks he can micro manage every overseas footfall of an Australian soldier and uses that as a bludgeon against defenceless children. It is not difficult to see. Only dogma and religion can cloud the view.

4.18 : "it's not our war" Yet it does appear to have triggered failure and reactions in the Police Minister. He needs to take an unspecified duration break. The difficult part may well be observing the difference of the way the Minister constructs his case on many unsupported claims and certainly on shaky grounds morality ethically, mental health wise, equality, mistreatment of children, bullying and stand over demand making with no supporting evidence.

Presenter: Okay there's something here that can be discussed. Kids watch this stuff even on their own devices, isn't there room for education on modern day events?

Statement 5:

Minister for Police: Well that's right it's called social studies ¹⁹, it's called social sciences ²⁰, and it's a very important part of the process ²¹. But it can't be biased, it can't be taught by teachers who have a preconceived idea of what is right and what is wrong ²² or a pre conceived version of where the government in this country should be and it shouldn't be ²³. They should be as apolitical as possible and it should certainly not be a message which says to the educators or those that are being educated that another arm of government, that being the police force, is somehow evil or corrupt or going to hurt you ²⁴.

5.20 : "it's called social studies" Irrelevant political statement unless there is supporting evidence of a criminal act

5.21 : "it's called social sciences"

5.22 : "a very important part of the process"

5.23 : "can't be biased"

5.24 : "teachers who have a preconceived idea of what is right and what is wrong"

5.24 : somehow evil or corrupt or going to hurt you"

5.23 : "another arm of government"

5.23 : "those that are being educated"

The security of the person, equality before the law, the presumption of innocence, social justice and human rights are all missing. They have been used, abused and tossed aside in the religious zeal of those with a need to make Australia a Christian theocracy or to exploit it as much and as hard as possible using the myths of religion as a cover.