The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood. The Christian religion at it's core is a toxic mechanism whereby intergenerational trauma has been kept alive, active and deeply embedded in each new generation over the past 2,000+ years.
#3 "Chronic Cultural Trauma. Systematic abuse, blocking, stymieing of those who tried to speak out. Chronic Childhood Trauma. Normalized Human Rights Abuses under the cover of the freedom to practice a religion"
It is noted that the claim of holding evidence by Robert Brown showing that I am a fraud has not been mentioned since internal inquiries were made via Peter O'Callaghan's office.
The question remains as to whether Robert Brown actually has evidence to support his statement that he has evidence to prove that I was not abused as a child and if so where is that evidence.
Similar questions have to be asked as to the reasons why O'Callaghan dropped my claim based on the statement of my sister Janette who was around 4 years of age when I was abused by O'Donnell and I am at a loss as to what she may know that would prove that I was not abused as a child by Catholic clergy
Holder of evidence not born at this stage
My abuse as a 3.5 year old occurred before my sister was born, does her statement go to my claim re my abuse before she was born?
One has to ask if this is another instance where events some 30 years after my abuse can be claimed as evidence that I was not abused as a child by Catholic clergy.
Also of note is that when asked for copies of transcript of interview with other family members (who have advised as to what they provided to O'Callaghan and that that flies in the face of claims by my sister and brother) and those copies of transcripts can no longer be found according to O'Callaghan's office. In order for those statements to have any legal standing they must be produced else those claims of statement cannot be substantiated and can only be seen as vexatious.
Another bout of events happening many years after my abuse being used to deny my abuse. The lack of logic and reason in that is simply staggering.
Events some 6 years after my abuse at 8 years of age have been deemed sufficient by Peter O'Callaghan to deny my claim. This 6 years later claim has been ceased upon by Peter O'Callaghan to deny my claim and in that process has denied me my right to justice.
My claim now is that Peter O'Callaghan and his use of spurious "evidence" some 6 years later to deny me my natural right to justice.
It happened and then it didn't
The events referred to by Peter O'Callaghan are events that took place some 6 years after my abuse by O'Donnell. Attempts to obtain information about these claims have proved unsuccessful as Peter O'Callaghan is unwilling to provide copies of the statement by my sister that relate to those events some 6 years after my abuse.
Surprise yourself - www.google.com/search?q=traumainreligion.com+-site%3Awho.in
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Look for these other FAQyMe Gene educated, secular, social-inclusion sites.
Clergy Abuse Action - repurposed || Molested Catholics by the Million || Captain Obvious - My Broken Society || A first in Secular Australia for Children - It's not Rocket Science || The Blue Print - It's OH so Obvious - repurposed || The GCAC - The Global Clergy Abuse Crisis - repurposed || TFYQA Think for Yourself, Question Authority || XT3 Molested Catholic courtesy of George Pell and babbling Benny || Defending the Human Rights of Catholic Adults and Children Trauma in Religion || The FAQyMe Gene - The FAQ Why Me Gene blog
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or with absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact religion human rights rights of the child justice for survivors of abuse by religious
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
.
