The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood. The Christian religion at it's core is a toxic mechanism whereby intergenerational trauma has been kept alive, active and deeply embedded in each new generation over the past 2,000+ years.
#159 "Chronic Cultural Trauma. Exploiting Chronic Emotional Manipulation and Horror Embedded Cultural Trauma and Mental Health "
UPDATE: Sunday, July 22, 2018 2:02:56 PM
Take away the last avenue for the Catholic Church to remain a law unto itself by amending s116 of the Australian constitution
"The Commonwealth shall not make any law for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion"
Free exercise does not include the freedom to break or manipulate the laws of the country.
Breaking or forming the laws of the country as a means of covering up child sex crimes of clergy whilst simultaneously advising and lobbying governments on matters of law, equality, morality and the human rights of women and children is an act of subversion against the nation and the people of Australia
.The assumption that all religions are without flaws (require no oversight) can not be applied given that there can be national security issues
In January 1941, acting pursuant to the National Security (Subversive Organisations) Regulations 1940,[2] the Government of Australia declared Jehovah's Witnesses to be "prejudicial to the defence of the Commonwealth"
An issue becomes a national interest when dealing with a subversive organisation
The question that may need to be asked is did the cover up as shown by the royal commission and subsequent cases subvert or attempt to subvert or undermine the power and authority of any Australian government institutions? If the answer were to be Yes then they potentially could be outlawed under the same laws as the Jehovahs
My line of thinking has been an institution would commonly be seen as a moral danger when a measurable percentage (1%) of its leadership have been found to have engaged in the covering up of sex crimes against children committed by fellow clergy.
In the Catholic instance the Royal Commission found in hundreds of Catholic institutions had a measurable percentage of rapist clergy in excess of 6% and in instances higher than 60%. The fact that more than 60,000 children were found to have been sexually abused with more than 60% of those in Catholic institutions it requires more than a leap of faith to see this organisation anything other than of moral danger and a menace to society and that would be the first of many obvious attempts to subvert the course of justice in Australia. The act of defending the Church in defiance of the law or the intention of the law is there and must have taken place on many occasions (became commonplace - as a part of a Christian culture.
Was the intention of 116 one that would permit the takeover of the day to day management and operation of the country by a single religion such as Christianity and did it intend that a single religion should usurp the role of moral authority and ethical advisory while moving rapist clergy from parish to parish and denying the right to justice of survivors who attempted to come forward under the protection of the laws of Australia. They were hijacked right back to their abusers and the only legislation that has the ability to achieve that is the free exercise clause in s116.
An institution would commonly be seen as a moral danger when a measurable percentage (1%) of its leadership have been found to have engaged in the covering up of sex crimes against children committed by fellow clergy.
In the Catholic instance the Royal Commission found in hundreds of Catholic institutions had a measurable percentage of rapist clergy in excess of 6% and in instances higher than 60%. The fact that more than 60,000 children were found to have been sexually abused with more than 60% of those in Catholic institutions it requires more than a leap of faith to see this organisation anything other than of moral danger and a menace to society.
Did the cover up as shown by the royal commission and subsequent cases subvert or attempt to subvert or undermine the power and authority of any Australian government institutions or does this show that there were countless acts that had the intent to pervert the course of justice across the country when it came to the sexual abuse of children by clergy?
Given that section 116 excludes the Catholic religion from all or any forms of law, regulation covering equality, justice and human rights without suitable moral and ethical requirements let alone the need for evidence and oversight is an abrogation of the ethical responsibility of every Australian and every Australian politician.
Gone are the days of the Catholic Church being a law unto itself? Those days are still here with s116
Take away the last avenue for the Catholic Church to remain a law unto itself by amending s116 of the Australian constitution.
In Krygger and Williams the court stated "the doing of acts which are done in the practise of religion. To require a man to do a thing which has nothing at all to do with religion is not prohibiting him from a free exercise of religion. It may be that a law requiring a man to do an act which his religion forbids would be objectionable on moral grounds, but it does not come within the prohibition of sec. 116, and the justification for a refusal to obey a law of that kind must be found elsewhere.". This indicates that the authority is there should the court be requested to define it.
Sec. 116 of the Constitution provides that "the Commonwealth shall not make any law for . . . prohibiting the free exercise of any religion " - that is, prohibiting the practice of religion - the doing of acts which are done in the practise of religion. Krygger and Williams [How is the doing of the acts of child rape when carried out by the religious as though it were a right of theirs to rape women and children as that may help the cleric on his journey to heaven or sainthood.]
No one can doubt that the defence of his country is almost, if not quite, the first duty of a citizen, and there is no room for doubt that the legislature has power to enact laws to provide for making citizens competent for that duty. Krygger and Williams
To require a man to do a thing which has nothing at all to do with religion is not prohibiting him from a free exercise of religion. It may be that a law requiring a man to do an act which his religion forbids would be objectionable on moral grounds, but it does not come within the prohibition of s 116. Krygger and Williams
Surprise yourself - www.google.com/search?q=traumainreligion.com+-site%3Awho.in
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Look for these other FAQyMe Gene educated, secular, social-inclusion sites.
Clergy Abuse Action - repurposed || Molested Catholics by the Million || Captain Obvious - My Broken Society || A first in Secular Australia for Children - It's not Rocket Science || The Blue Print - It's OH so Obvious - repurposed || The GCAC - The Global Clergy Abuse Crisis - repurposed || TFYQA Think for Yourself, Question Authority || XT3 Molested Catholic courtesy of George Pell and babbling Benny || Defending the Human Rights of Catholic Adults and Children Trauma in Religion || The FAQyMe Gene - The FAQ Why Me Gene blog
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or with absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact religion human rights rights of the child justice for survivors of abuse by religious
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
.
