The inability of a child to thrive in a Constitutionally protected God based perpetual threat and rape culture is not a fault of the child; however it does become their odious responsibility upon reaching adulthood. The Christian religion at it's core is a toxic mechanism whereby intergenerational trauma has been kept alive, active and deeply embedded in each new generation over the past 2,000+ years.
#15 "Chronic Cultural Trauma. Systematic abuse, blocking, stymieing of those who tried to speak out. Chronic Childhood Trauma. Normalized Human Rights Abuses under the cover of the freedom to practice a religion"
John Brown 1 December 2015 ยท
Has the Royal Commission shown that it too is blind to the use of traumatically embedded threats to smoke the minds of those investigating these abuses and the people of Australia?.
A trauma informed inquiry would have jumped when the bishop casually used a plea to the Christian God as a way to add weight to his statement - this went through all the way unchallenged despite the fact that the Christian God has been regularly used by clergy to access and to abuse children in a variety of ways including sexual abuse? The bishop also often spoke of the welfare and wellbeing of people and the community.
If a witness stated that Thor or Mars played a role then it would be questioned with the deepest and most penetrating lines of inquiry possible while simultaneously calling for substantiated evidence to support the many claims revolving around each of those gods; in the Royal Commission it appears that the Christian God gets a get out of jail free pass and all of its claims are dutifully accepted.
It would be an open example of an inability were the Royal Commission not to investigate the use of the Christian God as a tool in the grooming and the abusing of children; else this would be one of those examples of cognitive bias that research often points to as a primary culprit or effectively that this is so deeply embedded into the culture of the Royal Commission to the extent that it considers this in a distorted way that makes this threat into something benign and beneficial.
The bishops statement when viewed from the perspective of the defenceless child would be seen as a dictate; a circumstance were they not to fulfil the wishes of the bishop could result in their instant death on this earth and the beginning of a billion plus years of exquisite torture. The Royal Commission appears to have separated itself from the position of the defenceless child and viewed the bishop's statement through whatever survival mechanism they have developed for themselves over the duration of their own lives.
A trauma informed Royal Commission will have either added this as a means to address this issue later in the proceedings where it can introduce the issue from the trauma informed perspective of the child who is on the mere mention of a word thrown into a state of fear and terror with only one avenue available for them to follow.
A Royal Commission could spend a thousand years investigating every legal transaction and would never touch on the aspect of the control that was forced into the mind of the child and that it continues on in the lives of those children as adults with psychologically trapped minds able to be switched on and of at will or random by the right person using the right words. The Universal declaration of Human Rights seeks to prevent this form of psychological entrapment through ensuring that no child should be exposed to this form of abuse as it removes any potential of self determination for the child and on throughout their life until through some fortune they are able to shed the bonds that are designed to control them,
The root of the abuses will never be found unless the Royal Commission begins to take the perspective of the victims and their trauma seriously.
That is of course unless the Royal Commission is soon to bring us an understanding of the human rights of victims and of the reality of trauma forced onto children at the most vulnerable points in their life through the use of doctrine to terrorise and take effective control of the child's mind through the insertion of fear and dread and a demand of obedience at the cost of their life.
"This is a matter for the church and I respect the internal judgements of the church. I don't stand outside the church and provide them with public lectures in terms of how they should behave. I've noted carefully what his Holiness has said in the United States. Obviously that was a source of great comfort and healing in the United States. I'm like all Australians very much looking forward to what the Pope has to say here in Australia as well, as I am to my own conversation with the Pope later this morning." Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, 17 July 2008. more
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these information pages which are focused on providing knowledge and information to survivor/victims on their Human Rights with justice, compassion and empathy at the fore along with sound knowledge of Human Biology and Psychology, Human Evolution and Neuroscience. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
Look for these other FAQyMe Gene educated, secular, social-inclusion sites.
Clergy Abuse Action - repurposed || Molested Catholics by the Million || Captain Obvious - My Broken Society || A first in Secular Australia for Children - It's not Rocket Science || The Blue Print - It's OH so Obvious - repurposed || The GCAC - The Global Clergy Abuse Crisis - repurposing to ''A Global Statement'' || TFYQA Think for Yourself, Question Authority || XT3 Molested Catholic courtesy of George Pell and babbling Benny || Defending the Human Rights of Catholic Adults and Children Trauma in Religion || The FAQyMe Gene - The FAQ Why Me Gene blog
Wednesday, 22 June 2022 - I may not have this down syntax, word and letter perfect or with absolute precision in every aspect; however time and the evidence will show that I am closer to the truth than any religion has been or will likely be.
Let history be the standard by which that is measured.
Youtube - listen to Commissioner Bob Atkinson get it wrong - again
The Commissioner informs us that the clergy sexual abuse issue was all over and that it had only been a small statistical glitch around the year 2000. History shows this to have been a display of absolute ignorance on the issue ...
Makarrata : a better future for our children based on justice and self-determination. The Uluru Statement from the Heart. See Yours, mine and Australia's children. I acknowledge the Traditional People and their Ownership of Australia.
trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact religion human rights rights of the child justice for survivors of abuse by religious
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
.
