UPDATE: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 9:33:16 AM

Starting point Knowmore

knowmore-over-responsible2.jpg

knowmore-over-responsible.jpg

http://knowmore.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Common-Experiences-2017.pdf

Exploring the narrow dwindling lines between bad psychology and religious teaching

Common Experiences

"• Feeling the need to protect others and being over-responsible."

Feeling the need to protect others and being over-responsible. A child who has experienced sexual assault is taught that other people’s needs come first. Many adults who experienced childhood sexual assault have difficulty asserting themselves. Many feel they have to look after everyone over and above their own needs;

"over-responsible" - this is in reference to the global rape of hundreds of thousands of children by the religious and those in authority over children. For hundreds of years these rapists have been protected within our communities on the basis of the belief that doctrines and dogmas are emotionally and psychologically perfected for those who find themselves embroiled in the activities of a religious cult.

The DSM authenticates socially harmful cult practices if they are deemed to be a part of a "mainstream religion". This flawed philosophy has no mechanism for management and control of application within communities due to its philosophy of exempting individuals if they engage in the common delusion of believing in ghosts, spirits and gods

This is how a society can be hijacked and social structures destroyed while the goods and chattel of a religion become more important than the lives of individual children. Effectively the DSM has played a much larger role in the spread of the sexual abuse of children across our countries and our communities.

How does the DSM treat over-responsible people when they publicly proclaim and demand that the rest of community and society engage in their ritualised practices?

"No greater love ...." = over-responsible.

Religious doctrine advocates and demands bad psychology from everyone along with the codified exemptions provided by the DSM

"over-responsible" - this is in reference to the global rape of hundreds of thousands of children by the religious and those in authority over children. For hundreds of years these rapists have been protected within our communities on the basis of the belief that doctrines and dogmas are emotionally and psychologically perfected for those who find themselves embroiled in the activities of a religious cult.

The DSM authenticates socially harmful cult practices if they are deemed to be a part of a "mainstream religion". This flawed philosophy has no mechanism for management and control of application within communities due to its philosophy of exempting individuals if they engage in the common delusion of believing in ghosts, spirits and gods

This is how a society can be hijacked and social structures destroyed while the goods and chattel of a religion become more important than the lives of individual children. Effectively the DSM has played a much larger role in the spread of the sexual abuse of children across our counties and our communities.

How does the DSM treat over-responsible people when they publicly proclaim and demand that the rest of community and society engage in their ritualised practices?

"No greater love ...." = over-responsible.

Religious doctrine advocates and demands bad psychology from everyone along with the codified exemptions provided by the DSM

According to the thinking of those who developed and support the DSM model of mental health your concerns are entirely your own responsibility and in that respect according to those proponents your thinking and motivations are deeply flawed.

Corporate tax cuts, penalty rates and promises by government on these things pale in the face of the fraud being perpetrated against those who were raped by the religious and those in authority in institutions.

The DSM exempts diagnoses from those who base their actions on snippets from religious dogma and beliefs such as "No greater love ... lay down his life" yet can find someone with no belief in such notion to be "over responsible" and therefore needing medication and deep therapy.

Trying to protect children from rapists is taking your responsibilities towards others too far according to the logic - therefore be silent like the rest of us and leave it to the church to cover up for its global crimes of rape of the vulnerable at every opportunity.

Built in cover up via the DSM !!!

The DSM has little science to support it and as such it is about as valid as a passage from some primitive writings in holy or spiritual social engineering books from thousands of years ago.

When a mental health disease has to be determined on the basis of voting by the proponents who make a living from it the word fraud should stand out in ultra bold letters.

It's weird collection of disorders has directly cost the lives of unknown numbers and the drugs they distribute account for thousands of people murdered in mass shootings down through to local bullying in every community on the planet.

When a "highly specified" brain chemical imbalance that cannot be supported by any known scientific testing utilises highly concentrated chemicals across the entire brain and brain stem with a drug that is said to be focused on a very small specific region of the brain your skeptism should overflow with questions.

Should you help the children or should you manipulate the situation so that you can become the hero through losing your life - stylised and systemic insanity is my best description. The blank faced stare you get when you question the philosophy of this form of mental torture and drugging along with robotic statements of "It's the best we have got" are supposed tp get us past the fact that the DSM has more in it that kills and does not work and bringing long term suffering to millions to such an extent it should enroll itself asjust another of the abusive Christian cults.